[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: X10 replacement?

Subject: Re: X10 replacement?
From: "Jack Ak" <akjack@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 01:55:01 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.home.automation
References: <1159469739.074022.52650@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <451e7b98.949064312@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1159648500.561933.81410@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <451edb0d.973501187@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <LfWTg.7508$GR.2404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"Joerg" <notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:LfWTg.7508$GR.2404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hello Dave,
>
> >
> >>Cheap to start, is not the same as cheap to do all the fancy stuff.
> >>And Joerg says X10 could be all of those, if they would only listen to
> >>him...  ;-)
> >
> > X-10 has donme fairly well for about 30 years without listening to Joerg or
> > anyone else.
> >
>
> But how much better could it have done if the receivers were designed well?
>
...

"Designed well" comes with a significant cost disadvantage.  For what X10 components
cost, "designed adequately" has always been sufficient for my wallet.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: X10 replacement?
  - From: Joerg

References:
- Re: X10 replacement?
  - From: Joerg

Prev by Message: Re: X10 replacement?
Next by Message: [no subject]
Previous by thread: Re: X10 replacement?
Next by thread: Re: X10 replacement?
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

comp.home.automation Main Index | comp.home.automation Thread Index | comp.home.automation Home | Archives Home