Re: BX24-AHT code snippet

[MFHult@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Seems to me  QED (Latin) and, for that matter,  QED (English) ;-)

... Marc
Marc_F_Hult
www.ECOntrol.org


On 15 Sep 2005 15:49:03 -0700, tom2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote in message
<1126824543.272163.91250@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

>WOW,
>
>Does this go back some time....
>
>Yup.  T. Laureanno here... back from a rather long break I would say.
>Glad (or am I really) to see my name sprinkled throughout this thread.
>So, there appears to be a little controversy here re: the adaptation of
>the whole house transceiver?  I must say though from the top, I believe
>I was the first to develop such a device and I was happy enough to
>share my finding with others who had interests (I in fact am still
>using the whole house transceiver I designed years ago).  I really do
>not want to get into a pissing contest here but Dave, you must admit
>that I did initially come up with the decoding scheme and most
>importantly, the idea of interfacing to the RF daughterboard.  I would
>hate to think that others illegally made $$ off of something I
>intellectually own, but in any case, to me, it's "water under the
>bridge".  In the past, I have learned to watch what I often freely
>divulge to people over the internet.  Lessons been learned (Dave and
>Ido are just a few examples).  BTW (here comes a plug!), my webpage has
>been moved to www.laureanno.com
>
>cheers,
>Tom
>
>Marc F Hult wrote:
>> On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 01:00:47 GMT, nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Dave Houston) wrote
>> in message  <431a09d9.204068909@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>> >I've been accused of basing the BX24-AHT design on Tom Laureanno's Basic
>> >Stamp code project.
>>
>> It is a matter of public record that I did nothing of the sort. So who
>> accused you?
>>
>> I wrote "Dave designed (with input from comp.home.automation discussions)
>> built, marketed, and recommended the BX24-AHT []".
>>
>> You responded "There was _no_ design input from anybody in CHA (and this
>> lying SOB cannot reference a single message to support his lies)."
>>
>> I then  quoted what you wrote in comp.home.automation, namely:
>>
>> :Dave announced the BX24-AHT  a month _after_ he wrote this in
>> :comp.home.automation
>>
>> :	From: dhoust...@xxxxxxxx (Dave Houston)
>> :	Subject: multi-housecode transceiver
>> :	Date: 2000/10/06
>> :	Message-ID: <39de2687.80534212@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>#1/1
>>
>>
>> :	Following Tom Laureanno's progress I've been doing a bit more work
>> 	on this. Once Tom posts his BS2SX code, I'll see if I can adapt
>> 	it to a BX-24 but with a CM11A as the powerline interface.
>>
>> and I remarked "Sounds a lot like a BX24-AHT-thingy  to me ..." and cited
>> other discussion about the code cited above and general discussion of the
>> need for an All Housecode Tranceiver in comp.home.automation.
>>
>> You obviously saw the cited code as potentially useful "input" because you
>> yourself stated that you would see if you could adapt it.
>>
>> I made no statement whatever about whether any specific details of this
>> demonstrated "input" made it into the final design, only that there was
>> "input from comp.home.automation discussions" --  which there demonstrably
>> were --  and that adapting the cited BS2SX code to a BX24 with a CM11A
>> "sound[ed] a lot like a BX24-AHT-thingy to me" -- which it does.
>>
>> >Hult's claims are really ludicrous. It looks like the only way to stop this
>> >endless litany of lies is to file a lawsuit.
>>
>> I make no claims. I posted publicly available information. with references.
>>
>> To save you the trouble of looking it up in the phone book:
>>
>> Marc F. Hult
>> 322 E. 3rd St.
>> Covington KY 41011-1710