Re: mystery signal

[Marc F Hult <MFHult@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 19:33:29 GMT, Charles Sullivan <cwsulliv@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote in message  <pan.2005.11.13.19.33.28.763492@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:

>On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 00:41:31 +0000, Dave Houston wrote:
>
>> "Robert Green" <ROBERT_GREEN1963@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>Were the pre-existing transients visible on both phases?
>>
>> No - only on this one.
>>
>>>...it would be nice to know what it is.
>>
>> Yes - I like to solve mysteries.
>>
>>>I'd lend you my Monterey if I thought it would be any help.  It's a heck
of
>>>lot easier to check each outlet in the house than a scope setup.
>>
>> The Monterey wouldn't add anything. The scope is far better and the ESM1
can
>> tell me which outlets are involved although I had long ago mapped all
>> outlets to the two 'phases'. I also have a USB scope that is less capable
>> but still adequate for this. I can use it with my laptop when I need
>> something portable. But that really isn't going to tell me more than I
>> already know. The hangup is my lack of mobility.
>
>Dave,
>Considering how much help and information you've provided over
>the years, perhaps if you'd reveal the city you live in someone
>nearby would volunteer to stop by and be your "legs" to help
>track down the problem.  Just a thought.
>
>Regards,
>Charles Sullivan

There's someone living in my house who volunteers to do so. I'm very sure
that he even has an ELK X-10 powerline monitor and portable oscilloscope ;-)

... Marc
Marc_F_Hult
www.ECOntrol.org