Re: Preventing Random X-10 Code interference...

[nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Dave Houston)]

ddl@danlan.*com (Dan Lanciani) wrote:

>In article <42dfb3f7.16346454@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Dave Houston) writes:
>
>| BTW, most X-10 made PLC interfaces like the TW523, CM11A, CM15A, etc. do not
>| use cycle counting but sample the demodulated data envelope.
>
>The CM11A uses cycle counting.  I've never found any documentation on
>the ASIC in the TW523, but given that the input conditioning circuit is
>very similar to those found in most of the other pre-PIC X10 receivers
>I suspect that the TW523 uses cycle counting as well.

I was assuming the CM11A was like the CM15A - I've never seen a full
schematic.

As for the TW523, I was thinking more of its output than what it might do
internally but using cycle counting would explain why it gives a time
delayed output.