[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
Re: Starlink
- Subject: Re: Starlink
- From: ABLE1 <somewhere@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 08:49:13 -0400
- Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
- References: <sg3jp6$1pin$1@gioia.aioe.org> <0cbf8ff2-0144-406d-8c76-50275479b0efn@googlegroups.com> <sg8g8k$1rm9$1@gioia.aioe.org> <7e16ce6a-dadb-4033-b5e8-0ee3162b2871n@googlegroups.com> <sgivh8$7pv$2@gioia.aioe.org> <a58151cf-c576-483e-a2ca-28fa379f692fn@googlegroups.com>
On 8/30/2021 11:48 PM, Jim Davis wrote:
> On Monday, August 30, 2021 at 12:03:54 PM UTC-4, Bob La Londe wrote:
>
>>>
>>> It's been way too long since I stopped doing commercial fire systems so I don't know the answer to your fire requirement question but - - - -
>>> .
>>> Re your referral to the "wireless" service,
>>> .
>>> The Napco notice specifically says " intermittent issue related to outbound Verizon "phone lines" not wireless service.
>>> So I presume(d) they were referring to the communication between Verizon towers and Verizon servers or between Napco's servers and the central stations - - - both of which could be using "phone lines"
>>> .
>>> However, now days the term "phone lines" is often used generically, so - - - -
>>>
>> Still getting Starlink update emails. The email received today was much
>> more specific.
>>
>> Ok... you were right. I was wrong.
>>
>> Save this email. It may never happen again.
>
> OK, I printed it out magnified 10 times and have it framed on the wall right over my desk.
> Already Les and Rocky have asked for copies.
>
Waaaay too funny, for a Tuesday!!!!
alt.security.alarms Main Index |
alt.security.alarms Thread Index |
alt.security.alarms Home |
Archives Home