Re: NX unlocker

[Jim <alarminex@xxxxxxx>]

On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 4:05:19 PM UTC-5, doug wrote:
> "Jim" <alarminex> wrote in message
> news:e5787530-cb58-49a8-969b-3fb7c02d9318@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 12:46:26 PM UTC-5, E DAWSON wrote:
> > "Jim" <alarminex> wrote in message
> >The premise that seems to be too hard for you to appreciate is that if the
> >product wasn't available there wouldn't be any chance of it being >used for
> >nefarious purposes at all and that the manufacturer obviously doesn't care.
>
> Isn't that the argument used by the gun control lobbyists?


Hmmmm .... no, I don't think so ..... Let's see now. Just what else can this decoder be used for besides decoding an alarm panel?  Oh .... what's that you say? Nothing?

So send the company 50 "Attaboys" for doing something that's really upstanding and beneficial for the alarm trade.

>
> Lets face it Jim, in order to use this product someone has to be in the
> premises, sat in front of the alarm panel with a laptop, yes I suppose if
> they were in the building during opening hours they could access the panel
> and set up a new code for themselves for later use, but they could also just
> strap out the zones and/or tamper with the communication link with nothing
> more that a screwdriver and wire cutters.
>
> I don't see what the problem is with this device, especially if people are
> saying that if you know what you are doing then you don't even need it to
> view the code.
>
> Doug