[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
Re: Digital Watchdog VMAXFLEX - (Why its discontinued)
On Tuesday, March 31, 2015 at 12:52:12 PM UTC-4, Bob La Londe wrote:
> "mleuck" <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message=20
> news:0fd8a417-0b4e-4488-96d1-335d5165946b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > On Monday, March 30, 2015 at 5:15:16 PM UTC-5, Bob La Londe wrote:
> >> I knew it was discontinued, but it such a decent unit for the price th=
at=20
> >> I
> >> was still buying them for new installations. That might not have been=
=20
> >> such
> >> a great idea. I was told today they were not discontinued to make way=
=20
> >> for
> >> the new improved (and usually more expensive) model as companies are w=
ont=20
> >> to
> >> do, but because they can't get the parts to keep building them. This=
=20
> >> means
> >> when customers units are due for a rebuild in several years they will=
=20
> >> most
> >> likely HAVE TO be replaced instead of rebuilt.
> >
> > I don't agree with that Bob, DVR's in general have gone way down in pri=
ce=20
> > over the last 10-15 years and even some of the cheapest crap has quite =
a=20
> > bit of technology included. They are these days nothing more than a PC=
=20
> > with a cheap multi input video card. And like a desktop PC it easier to=
=20
> > junk the old stuff and replace it with something new which will likely =
be=20
> > twice as good at half the cost. That Digital Watchdog looks like a nice=
=20
> > unit but has nothing I haven't seen on other units.
> >
> > I have several DVR's laying around that went for several thousand dolla=
rs=20
> > when new 10 years ago now I'm about to toss em because they are almost=
=20
> > worthless. That's why a lot of big names are no longer in the biz. In m=
y=20
> > opinion the value is in the remote software more than the DVR
>=20
>=20
> Actually I have been using them as replacements for other DVRs, so I don'=
t=20
> disagree with your basic premise. I just like to think things are=20
> repairable. The customers do to even if they decided to replace and upgr=
ade=20
> instead.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> --
> Bob La Londe
> The Security Consultant
> Licenses ROC103044 & ROC103047
>=20
> *******************************
> *******************************
> Side Business:
> CNC Molds N Stuff
> www.cncmolds.com
>=20
> Day Job:
> The Security Consultant
> www.yumaalarm.com
>=20
> Hobbies:
> Honesty in Airguns
> www.allairgunners.com
>=20
> Fishing Arizona and the Colorado River
> www.YumaBassMan.com
> ******************************
> ******************************
We have people going from door to door in commercial areas selling CCTV ins=
tallations. After I had given one of my customers a quote for a system, one=
of these CCTV people walked in off the street and sold him four fixed lens=
eyeball outdoor cameras and a DVR for $2000.00. ( I quoted $4K ) It worked=
for a few years and one day my customer said the DVR wasn't recording anym=
ore .... could I take a look at it. The DVR had absolutely no markings on i=
t at all. No serial number, No UL, No Name .... NADA. Not even inside.=20
It was simply made to be throw-away type equipment. Probably worth a few hu=
ndred dollars including the cameras.
alt.security.alarms Main Index |
alt.security.alarms Thread Index |
alt.security.alarms Home |
Archives Home