[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Monitronics hit with $8 mill verdict

Subject: Re: Monitronics hit with $8 mill verdict
From: Jim <alarminex@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:44:58 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <75567266-8ff1-4332-9ea2-b228ec1b45dc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <8b99665b-a48c-47af-99bf-48cef84929b7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3bfdbaa7-9953-4ae1-a9ea-87d897e0c82e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sunday, July 21, 2013 11:30:35 PM UTC-4, mleuck wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 10:55:00 PM UTC-5, Jim wrote: > On Wednesday,=
 July 17, 2013 5:20:51 PM UTC-4, NickMark wrote: > > > https://www.kirschen=
baumesq.com/article/monitronics-international-inc-v-veasley-and-vice-versa-=
a13a0090-a13a0091-court-of-appeals-of-georgia-2013-ga-app-lexis-657-july-16=
-2013-decided So much for exculpatory contracts > > > > I was just thinking=
 ..... I guess Mark will have to take a pay cut for a few months until they=
 pay it off. You wish

WHAT?

In four weeks you could have the fine paid off.

Or maybe you could sell your recumbent bike and that slinky outfit you wear=
. I'm sure someone would buy it ...... just for the laughs.

References:
- Monitronics hit with $8 mill verdict
  - From: NickMark
- Re: Monitronics hit with $8 mill verdict
  - From: Jim
- Re: Monitronics hit with $8 mill verdict
  - From: mleuck

Prev by Message: Re: Monitronics hit with $8 mill verdict
Next by Message: Portable 120V Welder
Previous by thread: Re: Monitronics hit with $8 mill verdict
Next by thread: SOLUTIONS MANUAL: Derivatives - Principles & Practice by Sundaram , Das
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home