Re: ADI - Policy of Bad Behavior

[mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 1:11:12 PM UTC-5, Bob La Londe wrote:
> <jay@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message=20
>=20
> news:c4bms85i9h4fe39req3l5602fmngodidcd@xxxxxxxxxx
>=20
> > On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:13:12 -0700, "Bob La Londe" <none@xxxxxxxxxx>
>=20
> > wrote:
>=20
> >
>=20
> >>I just received a call from somebody with ADI corporate, and we had a b=
it=20
>=20
> >>of
>=20
> >>a verbal scuffle.  When I told them what they said they said that was n=
ot
>=20
> >>what they said, and then informed me that they were recording all the=
=20
>=20
> >>calls,
>=20
> >>and they would play it back to me.
>=20
> >
>=20
> >>.....
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>Did that sink in yet?  It took me a minute too.  They are recording
>=20
> >>telephone conversations without notifying you in advance or playing a
>=20
> >>recording notification tone.  I'm pretty sure that is illegal.  Ok, mor=
e
>=20
> >>than pretty sure.  Either the person on the other end is in the habit o=
f
>=20
> >>lying to customers routinely, or ADI has a corporate policy of illegal
>=20
> >>behavior.
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>--=20
>=20
> >>Bob La Londe
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>The Security Consultant
>=20
> >>PO Box 5720
>=20
> >>Yuma, Az 85366
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >
>=20
> > It's not illegal in AZ.
>=20
> >
>=20
> > http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/arizona-recording-law
>=20
> >
>=20
> > Arizona Wiretapping Law
>=20
> >
>=20
> > Arizona's wiretapping law is a "one-party consent" law. Arizona makes
>=20
> > it a crime to intercept a "wire or electronic communication" or a
>=20
> > "conversation or discussion" unless you are a party to the
>=20
> > communication, present during the conversation or discussion, or one
>=20
> > party to the communication or conversation consents. A.R.S. =A7 13-3005=
,
>=20
> > -3012(9). Therefore, if you operate in Arizona, you may record a
>=20
> > conversation or phone call if you are a party to the conversation or
>=20
> > you get permission from one party to the conversation in advance. That
>=20
> > said, if you intend to record conversations involving people located
>=20
> > in more than one state, you should abide by the recording law of the
>=20
> > most restrictive state involved, or play it safe and get the consent
>=20
> > of all parties.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Wow!  Looks like I was wrong.  Federal law is one party consent also.  We=
ll,=20
>=20
> ADI still sucks.

Bob any monitoring station records incoming calls