[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: NFPA trying to revive 730-731 as code

Subject: Re: NFPA trying to revive 730-731 as code
From: G. Morgan <sealteam6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 22:15:57 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1d171df7-e308-4b0b-a66b-1fd4e5ec266f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

NickMark Wrote:

>http://www.securityinfowatch.com/article/10811560/nfpa-creates-new-security-controversy
>
>The fuckheads at Not For Practical Application otherwise known as NFPA are at it again when are they going to get it that no one wants this and AHJ want nothing to do with it.

Such a thing already exists, a UL security approved (and inspected)
installation.

We are already supposed to follow the NFPA guidelines for cabling in any
installation.  What's next, an inspection for every security
installation - including resi?

References:
- NFPA trying to revive 730-731 as code
  - From: NickMark

Prev by Message: NFPA trying to revive 730-731 as code
Next by Message: Re: NFPA trying to revive 730-731 as code
Previous by thread: NFPA trying to revive 730-731 as code
Next by thread: Re: NFPA trying to revive 730-731 as code
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home