Re: The CIA knows how to defeat alarm systems

[mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 8:40:37 PM UTC-5, G. Morgan wrote:
> Frank Kurz Wrote:=20
>=20
> >On 18/06/2012 10:11 PM, mleuck wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 6:36:54 AM UTC-5, G. Morgan wrote:
> >>> mleuck Wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Wednesday, June 6, 2012 6:10:10 PM UTC-5, G. Morgan wrote:
> >>>>> mleuck Wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tuesday, June 5, 2012 12:44:39 AM UTC-5, G. Morgan wrote:
> >>>>>>> I'm watching something called "CIA Secrets" on Military Channel.
> >>>>>>> Show is from 2008.  They have a guy in a lab with a Napco panel
> >>>>>>> admitting he is trying to figure out what outside signal he can
> >>>>>>> inject to render it useless.  Obviously, in the lab the one they
> >>>>>>> showed was already compromised.  Seems they study every panel out
> >>>>>>> there, and make sure they have a way to defeat it from the
> >>>>>>> outside.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I recall reading a spy book where the agent had a secret code for =
every panel out there (mid 90's era I think). It'd be a disaster if if was =
found to be true.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I know the Baylor police have the same code they use for
> >>>>> everything.  Fucking stupid.  They once had reason to believe it
> >>>>> was compromised so we had to go to each system and reprogram a new
> >>>>> code for them.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> They don't even tell the department heads about the code.  One day
> >>>>> I was in a rare book vault (waterbug replacement) and the head of
> >>>>> the department came in demanding how I could possibly gain entry.
> >>>>> :-)  She called the campus PD and the officer had to talk her down
> >>>>> for a good five minutes before her rage went away.  The PD already
> >>>>> knew I was in the vault because I told them before I went in.  We
> >>>>> just made a note to have the dispatcher call the lady if we were
> >>>>> going in.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> BTW:  Using that Google interface you are emailing me and posting.
> >>>>> I think you are hitting 'reply to author'.  Same with Jim and
> >>>>> Nick.
> >>>>
> >>>> Nope no Reply To Author is available, just reply. I'd get another re=
al newsreader but since newsgroups are dying and I come here once a week it=
 isn't worth it except for amusement with Jim
> >>>
> >>> Just quit emailing me, geeze...
> >>
> >> Learn how to block emails, geeze...
> >
> >He's complaining about one or two emails...  Sheesh!
>=20
> I'm complaining about a lazy Google Grouper that does not know how
> to reply via the very simple web interface.  You would think a
> genius like Markie could tell the difference between "Reply"=20
> and "Reply to author".  The latter posts and emails, "reply" only
> sends to Usenet. It's unsolicited email, penalty is death by being
> drawn and quartered in front of 60k fans at a Cowboy's game.

Well jeepers Mr Genius this super sophisticated Google web interface oddly =
seems to offer only a "Reply" button and not a "Rely to Author" button. Now=
 I did have Lasik way back in 2002 but I don't think my eyes have deteriora=
ted much since then not to notice these kind of things.

I do however know how to ignore unwanted emails or mark them as spam, I sug=
gest you learn that sometime in the near future