Re: Alarm/security related domains for sale

[mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tuesday, June 5, 2012 8:44:14 AM UTC-5, Frank Kurz wrote:
> On 24/05/2012 1:38 PM, mleuck wrote:
> > On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 9:15:05 AM UTC-5, Frank Kurz wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, as I recall Jim was rather "unprofessional" in his dealings with
> >> the court.  You definitely don't tell a Federal Court Judge that she has
> >> "no jurisdiction" or thumb your nose at her when your IN court.  I think
> >> he had a good case but some of the things he wrote telegraphed his total
> >> Granted, Brinks really didn't have a leg to stand to begin with.
> >> They DON'T (and
> >> never have) manufactured their own panels.  Every user and installer
> >> manual I saw had the Honeywell logo on it!
> >
> > They may not have manufactured the equipment but they likely have the rights to it.
>
> They have the rights to the Brinks Logo, but to sue Jim because he's
> selling "their" re-badged programmer should not have turned out the way
> it did.  Jim's defense submittals mentioned this, but his point was lost
> when he told the judge to "shove it".
>
> Frank

But none of us know what the agreement was between Brinks and Arrowhead (I assume it was them since they originally made the programmer.

Would I have a legal right to sell and install something branded with your companies name on it? Even without any agreement I doubt it.