[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: How did the burglars enter?



"Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:363629.152.1334107739331.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@xxxxxxxxx
> On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 3:18:44 PM UTC-4, Robert Green wrote:
>> "G. Morgan" <sealteam6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:4uv2o712jvk030avfj96iblr00cjubj6ln@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Robert Green wrote:
>> >
>> > > Do you know what jurisdictions require voice/video verification.
>> >
>> > No I don't but I will cross post this to ASA where hopefully
>> > someone will know.
>> >
>> > Does anyone have a list of burg. A/V verification jurisdictions?
>>
>> Thanks.  I can see why they require it.  When my neighbor had a new alarm
>> installed, the tripped it at least three times a month.  The fines
>> stopped
>> that.  (-:
>>
>> --
>> Bobby G.
>
> I think you may have missed the point.
>
> Fines are a good deterrent. But verification says that the police don't
> show up unless there is some prior visible observation that a crime is/has
> taken place ...... but that's for EVERYONE.... whether they've had a false
> alarm in the past ..... or NOT!
>
> That means that the police can continue drinking their coffee and eating
> their doughnuts behind the Fire house without having to take a work break.
> After all, of what good could come of the police having to show up even
> for a false alarm. What's that word .... Oh yeah .... deterrent.
>
> Buuut ... I'm sure that they'd much rather show up for an actual burglary
> ... and catch some one ...... but wait a minute now .... I guess they'll
> never get the opportunity to even experience that ... by the time that
> they get their verification. I'm sure the theives will never catch on that
> they're not going to show up first ....... right?
>
> Oh .... and what about all the money that's going to be saved by them not
> having to respond?  All that saved money is now going to be given back to
> the taxpayers ...... right? Because all the policemen that they had to
> hire to take care of the false alarms can be laid off now.


ROFL





alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home