[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Smoke alarms

Subject: Re: Smoke alarms
From: G. Morgan <usenet_abuse@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 21:45:43 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <eBEvp.3114$OZ2.2454@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <2a265a9a-1cc8-4362-97ef-bab326d35b4b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <a4841740-041d-4019-947b-e70af94309ec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4a99806f-c43f-4c56-b475-5bf22fbdf8b5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <eNednd15bZFaYV3QnZ2dnUVZ_o-dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <84180959-4d72-4642-90f6-e5bda3ce3610@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <jt62s6hdgl95cm6a5trqqojpikmtpnvqq4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <82995bd0-7865-4a19-9b68-0453794f7d3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

nick markowitz Wrote:

>I have not found any code . It is a recommendation. on smoke alarms.
>but most consumers do not know difference between a smoke alarm and a
>smoke detector.

It's on the manufacturers box, as a mandate; not a recommendation.  I'm
not going fishing for the code, but isn't following manufacturer's
directions considered 'code'?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Smoke alarms
  - From: Frank Kurz

References:
- Re: Smoke alarms
  - From: Doug
- Re: Smoke alarms
  - From: Jim
- Re: Smoke alarms
  - From: nick markowitz
- Re: Smoke alarms
  - From: Jim
- Re: Smoke alarms
  - From: Frank Kurz
- Re: Smoke alarms
  - From: Harry
- Re: Smoke alarms
  - From: G . Morgan
- Re: Smoke alarms
  - From: nick markowitz

Prev by Message: Re: My latest blog entry
Next by Message: Re: Osama is dead...
Previous by thread: Re: Smoke alarms
Next by thread: Re: Smoke alarms
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home