Re: What a stupid way to design a panel SK

[tourman <robercampbell@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Apr 19, 7:08=A0pm, nick markowitz <nmarkow...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We all know panel take overs happen all the time why they would design
> the SK 5808 that only way it can be defaulted is sent back to factory
> and leaving a client with out protection is beyond me. at least the
> older panels you could change a chip or use a jumper etc to reset it.
> Typical stupid engineer thinking.

RHC: Hey, it's no different than the same stupid engineering thinking
that designed the hardware lockout feature. Both manufacturers want
you to have to buy another board, rather than reuse an existing one
again. Designing the old one that way, or putting in an installer lock
feature in the newer ones just ensures that profit trumps ethics. What
else is new ??