[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: SIA standards

Subject: Re: SIA standards
From: halama_at_jablocom_dot_com@xxxxxxx (jan.halama)
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 20:20:07 +0000
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <672a5$4d9c6d35$451cfb68$29382@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7135f76c-9af6-4ac1-a931-ab9575cbd47f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <a18097db-cb68-4a04-bcd3-c72ccd6e8166@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <db057f0a-04dc-4cf7-8897-105c1459d280@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5150ad31-ad72-4faf-aedd-488312df6ead@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

responding to
http://www.secure-gear.com/security-physical/SIA-standards-59218-.htm
jan.halama wrote:
SRyckman wrote:

> On Apr 6, 10:56=A0pm, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Apr 6, 4:41=A0pm, nick markowitz <nmarkow...@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Only receiver I know that even receives SIA is Osborne Hoffman
>>> =A0do no=
> t
>> > know if they even make them any more
>>
>> Huh? Just about every receiver currently made supports SIA
>> including
>> Silent Knight, Honeywell and especially DSC, we use that format
>>


> Not SIA, SIA 2000 - they are different.   Yes SIA (original version)
> is supported by most current receivers, Surgard System x series, Bosch
> 6600, OH2000 (no longer sold), SK9500/9800, ITI CS5000, etc.



-------------------------------------

SIA the original version is probably SIA DC-03 am I right?

References:
- SIA standards
  - From: jan.halama
- Re: SIA standards
  - From: mleuck
- Re: SIA standards
  - From: nick markowitz
- Re: SIA standards
  - From: SRyckman
- Re: SIA standards
  - From: SRyckman

Prev by Message: Re: (OT) Hello there Mr Ryckman!
Next by Message: Re: SIA standards
Previous by thread: Re: SIA standards
Next by thread: Re: SIA standards
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home