Re: Tech Help!

[mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mar 6, 11:35=A0pm, Spellcheck Patrol <alarminst...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mar 6, 10:38=A0pm, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 6, 1:35=A0pm, "Doug" <n...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > "Spellcheck Patrol" <alarminst...@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> > >news:be04f2c8-8d42-43e9-81a5-f3defeb77607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=
..
> > > On Mar 4, 11:27 pm, Jim <alarmi...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > >That's where those 72 beautiful LEDs come into play. Works in 0 lux
> > > >with an IR distance of 150 feet
>
> > > I've yet to see a low cost IR camera that in the real world performs
> > > anywhere close to what the manufacturers specifications claim. It see=
ms
> > > common for the manufactures to grossly exagerate the performance of t=
heir
> > > LED equipped cameras.
>
> > > Doug
>
> > I used to feel the same way about motion detectors <
>
> The 50, 80, or 100lb pet immune motion?

Only the 80, the 50 and 100lb motions are fine