[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: the cold smoke issue

Subject: Re: the cold smoke issue
From: nick markowitz <nmarkowitz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 04:30:26 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <e4726aa1-43c6-4626-8a5e-1ec441be8961@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5cecf466-4c0f-46fc-9eb2-01e6ebe23f87@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Jul 20, 11:53=A0pm, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Jul 18, 7:57=A0pm, nick markowitz <nmarkow...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Couple years back there was an engineer who gave all this nonsense
> > about =A0cold smoke and smokes vs heats any one remember his website.
>
> That wasn't Patton was it?

Yea that was him.

References:
- the cold smoke issue
  - From: nick markowitz
- Re: the cold smoke issue
  - From: mleuck

Prev by Message: Re: Hey Rob Blaire
Next by Message: Napco Quicloader
Previous by thread: Re: the cold smoke issue
Next by thread: Pa. getting tough on shoplifters
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home