[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Napco GEM3200 Reporting problem



Just set it for Pager and you'll be fine.  The panel will
dial the number and send DTMF tones as though it was talking
to a real pager. After a few seconds the panel will hang up.
There won't be a trouble condition any more.

If you need help with Napco software, give me a call.  I
don't charge for help programming - it's too much fun... :^)

--

Regards,
Robert L Bass

==============================>
Bass Home Electronics
DIY Alarm and Home Automation Store
http://www.basshome.com
Sales & Service 941-870-2310
Fax 941-870-3252
==============================>



"djteche" <dillonje@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7b4a4dc7-ea06-48e4-9b64-49fd662530ab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 21, 11:21 am, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Feb 20, 11:01 pm, djteche <dillo...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Feb 20, 10:57 pm, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 20, 10:52 pm, djteche <dillo...@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > New to the group, DIY'er, I have a GEM3200 that's
> > > > reporting to my
> > > > Asterisk PBX just fine, but when it finishes it
> > > > still throws a Comm
> > > > Fail E03-00 Trouble. I get full events reported, no
> > > > problems, but it
> > > > still throws the trouble...
>
> > > > Any ideas of what to look for in programming? The
> > > > same thing happens
> > > > if I switch to pager format.
>
> > > What format are you currently using? My guess is it's
> > > expecting an ack
> > > from a central station receiver that doesn't exist
>
> > Ah, stupid of me, Napco calls it Point ID but I know
> > it's Ademco
> > Contact ID, and the script I'm using gives a handshake
> > and ACK signal,
> > like I just armed and disarmed and both signals came in
> > at once, so
> > the panel is catching the ACK signal.
>
> > When in pager format, would it expect an ACK signal as
> > well?
>
> No not with the pager format, does it resend the signal
> over and over
> again before going into trouble?

No sir, sends the correct signals, each once, hangs up,
throws a
trouble, then momentarily picks up the line and re-hangs up.
Doesn't
attempt to re-send.



alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home