Re: Yet another ADT sob story

[nick markowitz <nmarkowitz@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Dec 17, 11:37=A0pm, tourman <robercampb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 11:08=A0pm, "Russell Brill" <russwbr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > "nick markowitz" <nmarkow...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> >news:7bd138e5-b39e-4dac-8c99-688e595c17e7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=
.
>
> > >http://consumerist.com/2010/12/monitored-alarm-system-wont-stop-break.=
..
>
> > This sounds fishy.... The "please let me out of my contract song" usual=
ly
> > means "I really want it FREE"... The alarm is junk, but she wants it mo=
ved
> > to another house??? I'm not trying to defend ADT, but their alarms work=
 a
> > lot better when turned ON...........
>
> RHC: Yeah, I'm no fan of ADT either; however, not turning the alarm on
> and then blaming the alarm for not doing it's job is a lot more common
> than most non-security people think. It never ceases to amaze me how
> many people will buy an alarm and then tell me at some point they
> never use it.

I see this all the time they claim alarm did not work etc etc. because
there being stalked by a high tech jealous ex
husband/ boy friend who can enter and do things in the home like
Houdini   .
In the end the victim in there own delusion has created and caused the
whole situation  time and again never found one legitimate case .
A system properly installed is very hard to defeat and if it is
defeated it is detectable. No signs of tampering the victim is
imagining whole thing and doing it to them selves. Buy the book I
could write on this.