[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: GE to get out of security buisness

Subject: Re: GE to get out of security buisness
From: mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 20:10:50 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <5df3f95d-d8ba-4325-89fa-c906ff9ed013@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <jdidnWusUMfOIwDXnZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sep 1, 7:37=A0pm, "RockyTSquirrel" <gafa@/nospam/usa.com> wrote:
> I take it from your comment =A0you didn't like =A0GE Security.. =A0 =A0 =
=A0(LOL)
> We never liked them =A0for (like you said) =A0what they did to Moose.

Moose was dead anyway, they made decent panels in the late 80's and
early 90's but the later ZX series wasn't anywhere close to being in
the same league as NX or Concord so it made sense GE killed them.

My problem with GE is they bought Interlogix then gutted everything
which left that division rudderless for several years, and don't get
me started on the Simon XT

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GE to get out of security buisness
  - From: Robert Neville

References:
- GE to get out of security buisness
  - From: nick markowitz
- Re: GE to get out of security buisness
  - From: RockyTSquirrel

Prev by Message: Re: Which system is better?
Next by Message: Re: OT: Foulball
Previous by thread: Re: GE to get out of security buisness
Next by thread: Re: GE to get out of security buisness
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home