[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Binky's back!!

Subject: Re: Binky's back!!
From: too fat for a ladder <alarminstall@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 22:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <uO_om.145112$8B7.101490@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <d488f27c-0853-4ffd-85e5-7aa4b87725b3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <74d4f846-6e57-4cbb-8b28-5e90ad2ea7b6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sep 7, 8:22 am, tourman <robercampb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sep 6, 11:20 pm, too fat for a ladder <alarminst...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 6, 11:08 pm, Frank Olson<use_the_email_li...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >http://www.securitysystemsnews.com/blogs/
>
> > > I'm sure the guys at "Broadview" are simply thrilled. <
>
> > and I'm waiting on your feedback on my websites too ya cockass.
>
> RHC: Give us some links then..... <

Why thank you for the invitation to put up the sandwich boards.
The sites are http://www.onlinealarmquotes.com and http://www.alarmquotesonline.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Binky's back!!
  - From: Robert L Bass

References:
- Binky's back!!
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: Binky's back!!
  - From: too fat for a ladder
- Re: Binky's back!!
  - From: tourman

Prev by Message: Re: Which system is better?
Next by Message: Re: Which system is better?
Previous by thread: Re: Binky's back!!
Next by thread: Re: Binky's back!!
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home