[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: UPlink 2550

Subject: Re: UPlink 2550
From: G. Morgan <usenet_abuse@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 02:11:14 +0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <4a089bc8$0$1330$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <h12Ol.32016$iW4.29869@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87b99a07-da83-4d79-8471-c26f10652ae8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4a099e34$0$87065$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Crash Gordon wrote:

>They have and it will - just spoke to Uplink.
>
>All it does is trick the panel into thinking it's connected to pots then
>passes the CID or SIA through, they say they are working on remote
>programming....not just a "uh maybe"

So will it work now or are they "working on it"?  The text above is
contradictory.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: UPlink 2550
  - From: Crash Gordon

References:
- UPlink 2550
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: UPlink 2550
  - From: ABLE1
- Re: UPlink 2550
  - From: mleuck
- Re: UPlink 2550
  - From: Crash Gordon

Prev by Message: Re: Cell Phone Jammers are Illegal in USA
Next by Message: Re: Why Your Yugo Doesn't Perform Like a Cadillac
Previous by thread: Re: UPlink 2550
Next by thread: Re: UPlink 2550
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home