Re: cameras/security

[Matt Ion <soundy106@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 7/2/2009 7:08 AM, G. Morgan wrote:
> Bob Worthy wrote:
>
>> Secondly, a court is more than likely going to want video that is
>> watermarked if it is going to be used as evidence. Think about that before
>> selecting recording equipment.
>
>
> Bob, have you ever personally known of a case where video was denied
> admissibility or it's authenticity was in question because of a lack of a
> watermark?

Bob didn't say a thing about it being admissible or not.  A watermark
(visible or otherwise) certainly helps if there's a challenge of the
video's authenticity, but I hardly think any court would rule it
inadmissible simply on the lack of a watermark.