[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Brinks Home Security Gets Caught Stealing From Its Customers



property tax?




--
**Crash Gordon**







"Frank Olson" <use-the-email-links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:FKahl.1666$UX6.1158@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> G. Morgan wrote:
>> Anonymous wrote:
>>
>>> Each of the three appellants' households entered into a contract with
>>> Brink's for a home security system. By the terms of the contracts,
>>> Brink's continued to own the systems and the homeowners paid a lease
>>> fee. Each contract included specific language obligating the homeowner
>>> to reimburse Brink's the cost it incurred for the payment of property
>>> tax on the homeowner's security system:
>>
>> That is messed up!  The whole point of leasing equipment (from the
>> customer's
>> standpoint) is that they don't have to pay property tax.
>
>
> "Old news".  The date of the opinion was in 2001.  That's eight years ago!




alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home