[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Minimum staf at a central

Subject: Re: Minimum staf at a central
From: Jim Rojas <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:38:51 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <gm5mpc$opj$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9a36006e-b9cf-41f8-a419-44502e4829f5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <gm5nu2$r83$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <oEthl.3091$mq5.2990@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <E9Ihl.62$VM5.28@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <8eee0178-c748-4e1d-9070-3ae07e16d0e5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Jim wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2:57ï¿½pm, "Bob Worthy" <secur...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I believe it is one person dedicated to handling strickly alarm activity and
>> a second ï¿½person that can have split responsiblities, such as data entry and
>> alarm activity, filing in at breaks etc. I am not so sure that OSHA might
>> not have a say about just one person (employee) working in a building by
>> themselves. Just a thought.
>>
>> Bob W.
>>
> Ummmm ..... well what if the Receiver is on the night stand beside
> your bed?


I have a nice Surgard SLR on my desk. The only thing keeping me from
obtaining a UL Certified Rating for monitoring is that my Surgard only
has a single line... :)

Jim Rojas

References:
- Minimum staf at a central
  - From: Petem
- Re: Minimum staf at a central
  - From: nick markowitz
- Re: Minimum staf at a central
  - From: Petem
- Re: Minimum staf at a central
  - From: Doug
- Re: Minimum staf at a central
  - From: Bob Worthy
- Re: Minimum staf at a central
  - From: Jim

Prev by Message: WTB Radioncs D7024
Next by Message: Re: Brinks Home Security Gets Caught Stealing From Its Customers
Previous by thread: Re: Minimum staf at a central
Next by thread: Working the day watch out of Grammarcide
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home