[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Elk M1 and X10 (TW523)

Subject: Re: Elk M1 and X10 (TW523)
From: Frank Olson <use-the-email-links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 21:45:58 -0800
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <fadfdd4a-0654-4c0f-8e19-88155b2b8036@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <xXFil.20305$%n5.5076@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <490266e6-fc2b-4588-9487-17cea5bebb9a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <o7adnevNSZy8-hHUnZ2dnUVZ_hWWnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Robert L Bass wrote:
> "Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Careful Jim. I don't know what a TW523 is, but if it has to
>> do with programing .....  I'm told that if you use the wrong
>> cord with the napco dongle, it can cause some damage.
>
> You're right about the Napco PCI-MINI dongle.  Use the wrong cord and
> you can ruin the PCI or the board.  The M1 connection to X10 is much
> simpler.  The preferred interface is the PSC05.  You should use a
> standard, 4-conductor telephone cable.
>


You're back!  Howz things?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Elk M1 and X10 (TW523)
  - From: Robert L Bass

References:
- Elk M1 and X10 (TW523)
  - From: Jamesarm97
- Re: Elk M1 and X10 (TW523)
  - From: Jim Rojas
- Re: Elk M1 and X10 (TW523)
  - From: Jim
- Re: Elk M1 and X10 (TW523)
  - From: Robert L Bass

Prev by Message: Re: Security Alarm
Next by Message: Re: 3 garden invasions in 6 months
Previous by thread: Re: Elk M1 and X10 (TW523)
Next by thread: Re: Elk M1 and X10 (TW523)
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home