Re: Minimum staf at a central

["Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

IMO one is never enough.

--
**Crash Gordon**







"Petem" <petem001@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:gm5nu2$r83$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> "nick markowitz" <nmarkowitz@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de groupe
> de discussion :
> 9a36006e-b9cf-41f8-a419-44502e4829f5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> On Feb 1, 9:40 pm, "Petem" <petem...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Any one here can tell me there feeling about what would be the minimum
>>> number of operator in a central station that have around 14k client?
>>
>> Ul requires 2 minimum operators for small central  check with UL as
>> they have a formula for how many operators must be present per so many
>> accounts.
>
> Thanks for the infi Nick, the only problem is that the central is in
> Canada..(but they do supervise some US client)
>
> I will check With ULC if they have the same type of formula..
>
> But while we are at it.. Would you feel confortable if your monitoring
> station would have only one operator on site from 1500 to 1700 on a week
> day and at the same time there was a snow storm outside..
>
> dont assume that its because one operator was not able to come.. there was
> no one program beside the guy that was allready there..
>
>
>
>