Re: Working the day watch out of Grammarcide

["Bob Worthy" <securinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Spellcheck Patrol" <alarminstall@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0003f206-817e-40d3-9f40-b094900f09d0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Feb 2, 2:57 pm, "Bob Worthy" <secur...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I believe it is one person dedicated to handling strickly alarm activity
>> and
>> a second  person that can have split responsiblities, such as data entry
>> and
>> alarm activity, filing in at breaks etc. I am not so sure that OSHA might
>> not have a say about just one person (employee) working in a building by
>> themselves. Just a thought.
>>
>> Bob W. <
>
> What in the name of the fat rat's snatch is "strickly"? I'll let you
> off with a warning for "responsiblities" but "strickly" cannot be
> overlooked.
> 5 point deduction.
> Feel the shame :-)

I could lie and say it was a test to see if you were still on the ball but I
won't. Spell check may have missed it since strick is a word even though
strickly isn't (my error) but yet stricken is. I don't sit and read what I
type in most cases when posting to the NG. Get the thought out and get on
with life. At least you forced me to use the spell check feature. One only
has so many demerits in life you know. With the weather up there have you at
least gone to a regular t-shirt rather that the tank top?
>