Re: Working the day watch out of Grammarcide

[Jim <alarminex@xxxxxxx>]

On Feb 9, 2:32=EF=BF=BDpm, "Bob Worthy" <secur...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Spellcheck Patrol" <alarminst...@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> news:0003f206-817e-40d3-9f40-b094900f09d0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 2, 2:57 pm, "Bob Worthy" <secur...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> I believe it is one person dedicated to handling strickly alarm activi=
ty
> >> and
> >> a second =EF=BF=BDperson that can have split responsiblities, such as =
data entry
> >> and
> >> alarm activity, filing in at breaks etc. I am not so sure that OSHA mi=
ght
> >> not have a say about just one person (employee) working in a building =
by
> >> themselves. Just a thought.
>
> >> Bob W. <
>
> > What in the name of the fat rat's snatch is "strickly"? I'll let you
> > off with a warning for "responsiblities" but "strickly" cannot be
> > overlooked.
> > 5 point deduction.
> > Feel the shame :-)
>
> I could lie and say it was a test to see if you were still on the ball bu=
t I
> won't. Spell check may have missed it since strick is a word even though
> strickly isn't (my error) but yet stricken is. I don't sit and read what =
I
> type in most cases when posting to the NG. Get the thought out and get on
> with life. At least you forced me to use the spell check feature. One onl=
y
> has so many demerits in life you know. With the weather up there have you=
 at
> least gone to a regular t-shirt rather that the tank top?
>
>
>
It wouldn't make any difference.
He's part Italian. The T shirt would have holes in it.