[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Wireless Alarm Systems

Subject: Re: Wireless Alarm Systems
From: Effenpig1 <dirtyspicevent@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:15:44 -0800 (PST)
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <3ccff32f-7f72-4aa1-8c75-243445fc7f48@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4c9126af-1105-42b4-b5e6-0e2fa3ef7a1b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <hgg9hh$d5r$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Dec 18, 11:10=A0am, "Bob La Londe" <nos...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Effenpig1" <dirtyspicev...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> news:4c9126af-1105-42b4-b5e6-0e2fa3ef7a1b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > On Dec 17, 4:10 am, Nilma Shehrawat <nilimashera...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Home security systems are steadily moving towards a more wireless
> >> solution. With news stories about children abducted from home, and
> >> increases in burglaries and home invasions, security is very important
> >> for households. Therefore you should never even consider buying sub-
> >> par alarm equipment. For examples of sub-par alarm equipment look
> >> here: =A0www.spamdeleted.com
>
> > Agreed
>
> You think everybody should visit his website?

Yes, If they want to see examples of sub-par alarm equipment

References:
- Wireless Alarm Systems
  - From: Nilma Shehrawat
- Re: Wireless Alarm Systems
  - From: Effenpig1
- Re: Wireless Alarm Systems
  - From: Bob La Londe

Prev by Message: Ping: Jim Rojas
Next by Message: Re: Panel grounding
Previous by thread: Re: Wireless Alarm Systems
Next by thread: Wireless Smoke Detector
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home