Re: Concord 4 issue or user issue?

[mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Dec 7, 11:33=A0pm, "alarman" <nos...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> mleuck wrote:
> > On Dec 7, 8:26 pm, "alarman" <nos...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> mleuck wrote:
> >>> Look it's real simple, poke around in programming then test the
> >>> system then tell the customer to let you know if it happens again
>
> >> As in , "there, it's fixed now"?
>
> >> Um, no. I am not about to fall on my sword so that some lying
> >> scumbag can save face. If I screw up, I'll admit that. (It's bound
> >> to happen eventually) But I'm not taking the rap to save some
> >> idiot's ego.
>
> >> --
> >> js
>
> >> Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
>
> > If they are lying I agree with you but I'm assuming they were just
> > mistaken that they didn't turn off the system.
>
> So you want them to think the system you installed was defective?
>
> --
> js
>
> Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum

No but it seems to work every time I tried it