Re: DSC GSM Radio back ups

["Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I just ordered a 2530 should have it Monday/Tuesday....apparently Uplink did
not do a very good job of promoting it to distrib. OR letting their tech
support know that it doesn't need a 2 amp pwr supply. Their documentation
isn't even finished yet - they sent me a red-lined copy of the install
sheet.

Supposedly it pulls 600ma max (verbally) but if you look at the docs it says
250ma on transmission...soooo...what does that mean? Dunno, they gave me
some double-speak dribble about 3 volts conversion from 12volt supply...have
no idea what they mean. But since a Vista 15 has 600ma and only running 1 kp
ought to be ok if you power from the battery charging circuit....or maybe
even the keypad buss power. I can hardly wait to blow one up.




--
**Crash Gordon**







"tourman" <robercampbell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e411f391-b36c-487a-b96b-f02843dd5448@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Aug 19, 12:02 am, "Crash Gordon" <webmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> Im gonna try this on an XR6 sending CID...if it doesn't work I'll go with
>> a
>> vista 10 probably...there's only 1 window, 2 doors and maybe a 1 gb and
>> maybe 1 keyfob.
>>
>> 2530  sounds good too.
>>
>> --
>> **Crash Gordon**
>>
>> "mleuck" <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>
>> news:0d819377-be0a-43b7-975e-304b80bb2c50@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> > On Aug 16, 11:27 pm, "Crash Gordon" <webmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > wrote:
>> >> 2550 is same flat rate (unless you increase the test frequency)...and
>> >> it
>> >> passes SIA & CID through, no extra big power supply and has its own
>> >> mini
>> >> battery backup. I'm gonna put one in my daughters apt next week.
>>
>> >> --
>> >> **Crash Gordon**
>>
>> >> "nick markowitz" <nmarkow...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:e321e97d-28ab-4467-8ad6-b0a714047530@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> >> > On Aug 9, 12:55 pm, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> >> On Aug 9, 6:45 am, nick markowitz <nmarkow...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> > On Aug 8, 4:31 pm, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> > > On Aug 7, 9:52 pm, G. Morgan <usenet_ab...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> > > > mleuck wrote:
>> >> >> > > > >If that is the plan he signed then yes, do you not
>> >> >> > > > >understand
>> >> >> > > > >how
>> >> >> > > > >service plans work?
>>
>> >> >> > > > Sure, they are one-sided with the advantage always going to
>> >> >> > > > Mega-Corp.
>>
>> >> >> > > And yet he still signed up, next time read the contract
>>
>> >> >> > > > For all we know that thing is sending bullshit
>> >> >> > > > diagnostics/updates
>> >> >> > > > and other
>> >> >> > > > non-alarm related stuff.  I would want to see a breakdown of
>> >> >> > > > the
>> >> >> > > > data
>> >> >> > > > allegedly x-mitted, and separate the garbage from the actual
>> >> >> > > > signals.
>>
>> >> >> > > Or he could have been sending opening/closings, daily test
>> >> >> > > signals
>> >> >> > > etc
>>
>> >> >> > Thats why I like  Uplink and its flat rate  may not do cid simple
>> >> >> > general burg or fiire but no cut offs or overages etc. like
>> >> >> > tellular
>> >> >> > and others.
>>
>> >> >> It sounds like you are using AnyNet, why not the new 2550?
>>
>> >> > waiting to try out a 2550 have not had any new cell back ups come in
>> >> > have used the cid adapter it works great for any net
>>
>> > They also have a cheaper 2530 coming out that's powered by the panel
>> > battery unless they've changed something since beta. I've got one
>> > connected to a 21iP and it works very well
>
> RHC: Yeah, I've just been talking to Uplink as well as my local
> wholesaler and I plan to install an Uplink 2530 unit next week for a
> client who has no phone line. The monthly rate for transmission is
> identical to any of the other digital Uplink units I have in service
> and it needs nothing special in the way of receivers at the monitoring
> station. If this unit works as advertised, it's a relatively
> inexpensive way to get around all the VoIP bull**it (assuming those
> cheapshit customers will pay for it of course...which they likely
> won't)
>
> But for anyone serious about their alarm transmission security to the
> station, this looks GOOD. I'll post later next week how it goes.....