[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
Re: Anyone using perimiter fence protection
Jim wrote:
>
> Realizing that my posts were tongue-in-cheek, (as I'm sure Robert
> surmised) makes your above post needless and somewhat provocative.
I didn't realize that your comments were "tongue-in-cheek". That's
often difficult to visualize in a "text only" medium.
>
>
> I know where "I'm" at. I'm sure Robert knows where "he's" at ..... at
> this jucture.
>
> There's no need for an arbiter.
I wasn't "arbitrating". I was merely sharing a few factoids. And the
last comment I made in my previous post (and to which you have
responded) was very much "tongue-in-cheek" (notice the "smiley"?)
>
> This is all that I have to say on this subject. Feel free to continue
> if you feel compelled.
I only "feel compelled" to clarify. You should know I'm the very LAST
person that wants this forum to degenerate into what it was before.
alt.security.alarms Main Index |
alt.security.alarms Thread Index |
alt.security.alarms Home |
Archives Home