[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Brinks Home Security Fraud

Subject: Re: Brinks Home Security Fraud
From: "Doug" <not@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:08:23 -0700
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <7c5b5a3c9bd4025477764cd52cdbad1a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <fc344d6d-fd46-4b9a-bb55-236ee83f47cc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Czm4k.28582$gc5.3535@pd7urf2no> <4851f974$0$87076$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <-6CdnTCfdusids_VnZ2dnUVZ_jadnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <V3n5k.32932$gc5.16593@pd7urf2no> <gsCdnf9wJ794SsvVnZ2dnUVZ_v_inZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <7FH5k.9176$kx.9159@pd7urf3no> <XKCdnQC6rqDR3sXVnZ2dnUVZ_t7inZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>



"BDEBJ" <spamsux.com> wrote in message
news:XKCdnQC6rqDR3sXVnZ2dnUVZ_t7inZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> as far as the connection fee part goes, i said you were "lying"
> because you also stated that as fact when maybe you should
> have said "here in vancouver....." see my point?
>
You don't have a point,  one could equally claim that your are lying because
you didn't state "here in BFE ........."

Doug

References:
- Brinks Home Security Fraud
  - From: Anonymous Sender
- Re: Brinks Home Security Fraud
  - From: failur_drill
- Re: Brinks Home Security Fraud
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: Brinks Home Security Fraud
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: Brinks Home Security Fraud
  - From: BDEBJ
- Re: Brinks Home Security Fraud
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: Brinks Home Security Fraud
  - From: BDEBJ
- Re: Brinks Home Security Fraud
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: Brinks Home Security Fraud
  - From: BDEBJ

Prev by Message: Re: Pool job (do a search, Nimrod)
Next by Message: Re: Start a new discussion
Previous by thread: Re: Brinks Home Security Fraud
Next by thread: Re: Brinks Home Security Fraud
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home