Re: DVAC - Line..Canada

["Pogo" <No_spam_marc@nospam>]

True, we are usually several year off the US tech trends in the Biz
world..or so my experience has been.
I recall doing an inquiry last year with DSC/Sureguard and only 4 I/P
station receiver were in operation. Two of which were in BC and the other I
can recall but the BC units were under beta test..
Schedule "C" circuits "DVAC from Bell has been slated for decommissioning
for the last 8years. I like the prospect of I/P monitoring but not the
reliability of the attached DSL routers and synking problems associated with
dynamic I/P's to the burg panels. Remote access is a big concern, does this
mean we will need static I/P's or will all panels be DDNS. If DDNS whom will
do the hosting...
How is the US version of this being benchmarked..what is the forerunner as
far as Panel manufacturers?


"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e7a050c4537d89fefa844734a0435125@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> >I am also hearing rumour that I/P monitoring will likely not get UL
>>cerification so I am trying to hold out till some clarity is shed on this
>>whole DVAC situation,
>
> I can't speak to ULC, but the US version of UL has accepted internet
> monitoring for years now.  So my guess is that ULC will get with the
> program eventually, though maybe not soon enough to solve your problem.
>