Re: seen this before?

["Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

'tis interesting indeed, the difference is that Binky doesn't sell "their"
alarm panels.



--
**Crash Gordon**







"Frank Olson" <use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:awxek.271$nD.87@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Bob wrote:
>> http://my.att.net/s/editorial.dll?bfromind=7434&eeid=5981891&_sitecat=1522&dcatid=0&eetype=article&render=y&ac=1&ck=&ch=ne
>> court is being consistent with binky ruling.
>
>
> I see that happening with the "little guy", but it appears that at least
> one company has argued (the story doesn't state "successfully") that the
> software in the phones is not the property of a particular provider. I'd
> be more interested in hearing the results of *that* particular argument.
> It would blow "Binky" out of the water because they do *not* manufacture
> their own panels.