Re: Term agreement with NextAlarm (Fishy?)

["Doug" <not@xxxxxxxx>]

 Having a local company isn't a solution for what the poster is asking, he
just needs to apply a little common sense. Its unreasonable to expect an
alarm or monitoring company  to assume unlimited liability when they are
only receiving somewhere between $8 and $30 per month for the service. You
have insurance to cover a loss, where the rates are calculated according to
the risk and declared value of property

I don't know how you do it in Canada Frank, but in the US its near universal
for an alarm or monitoring company, be it local or national to have
limitation of liability and third party indemnification clause's in their
contracts.

Doug
--

"Frank Olson" <use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:nFEjj.84152$EA5.25008@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> thx123@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> In other words, Next Alarm isn't responsible for *any* failures (including
> the fact that *you* may have mis-programed the account coding which could
> result in a false dispatch to another subscriber) because *they* didn't
> install the equipment and it's not being serviced by them. Sounds about
> right.
>
> Solution!  Call a local independent alarm company.  Have the system
> professionally serviced and avoid the legal hassle from "doing it
> yourself".