Re: DSC - Bug

[Red <RedNick@xxxxxxxxx>]

Jim;
I have absolutely no problem since Secure Wireless started making the
stuff for DSC.  I stopped with Honeywell also due to the price of the
transmitters.



On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:23:28 GMT, Jim Rojas <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>I haven't installed a DSC panel since the new ones came out. I got tired
>of the wireless crap they kept putting out.
>
>I mainly use Ademco now for both hardwired and wireless. It's good, and
>it works right the first time. Too bad ADI can't offer me better
>pricing. It's been 6 years since I purchased anything at ADI. I buy all
>my Ademco/Honeywell products from their online discounters.
>
>Jim Rojas
>
>
>
>
>George Siegle wrote:
>> Yes, 1832
>>
>> Correct on the dedicated duress code.
>>
>> Has been that way for years on DSC, so to say they have made this change
>> takes me back to the Ver 1,....opps.
>>
>>     "Just Looking" <Spam@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Spam@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote in
>>     message news:d7Cdncf9idLF8ZrVnZ2dnUVZ_tWtnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>     Many panels had similar features before CP-01. Now for CP-01 you
>>     have to have a dedicated duress code, as the new DSC series has.
>>     I have seen a PC1616 but not a PC1632. Did you mean PC1832?
>>
>>         "George Siegle" <gsiegle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>         <mailto:gsiegle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote in message
>>         news:BHJNj.543$og.403@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>         The 1616 & 1632 will not allow consecutive user codes.
>>
>>         1955,1956 will not work.
>>
>>         1955 & 1957 will work.
>>
>>         Called tech support, the story I was given: "DSC used to send a
>>         panic alarm when you added "1" to the last digit of the user
>>         code, to avoid this problem this was the change to prevent
>>         someone from doing that during a forced disarm and not getting
>>         help."
>>
>>
>>         My translation....Ver 1 OPPS.
>>