[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: DSC-ADT5020 (Programming Map)

Subject: Re: DSC-ADT5020 (Programming Map)
From: "Roland Moore" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:32:57 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <SPRGj.20442$xq2.17828@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <zrSGj.4821$Ew5.4586@trnddc04> <47ec33d3$0$22804$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <IahIj.26671$Ch6.19269@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <l7iIj.24976$6J3.3562@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

And thank God they continue to do so. It's great for business. They just got
the boot from another big government contract.

"alarman" <nospam@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:l7iIj.24976$6J3.3562@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Allan Waghalter" wrote
> > It appears that the locations are slightly out of normal positions from
> > the standard 5020.
> > Location that should contain the call back number has 1234.
>
> That could just be a programming error. I have seen ADT techs do some dumb
> stuff.
>
> --
> js
>
>

References:
- Re: DSC-ADT5020 (Programming Map)
  - From: Allan Waghalter
- Re: DSC-ADT5020 (Programming Map)
  - From: alarman

Prev by Message: Re: Cellular connectivity question
Next by Message: Re: Off contract soon with Apex, I'm looking for cheaper monitoring
Previous by thread: Re: DSC-ADT5020 (Programming Map)
Next by thread: Re: DSC-ADT5020 (Programming Map)
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home