[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Brinks v Rojas Update Request

Subject: Re: Brinks v Rojas Update Request
From: "BDEBJ" <biteme@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 19:27:35 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <3a640000c048e1c4808dd7ed4175b1f4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <IHhJi.799$kA4.561@trnddc07>

nope, but it IS true that you are a DICK!!
i don't mind anyone slamming any company when
things might actually be true, but this other guy has no clue
what he's talkng about....kinda like you, he just says shit,
hoping that someone will believe it, and that no one will
call him out on it.



>
> Odds are he's a Brinks saleschmuck.
>
> --
>
> Regards,
> Robert L Bass
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Brinks v Rojas Update Request
  - From: Jim
- Re: Brinks v Rojas Update Request
  - From: Mark Leuck
- Re: Brinks v Rojas Update Request
  - From: Disco

References:
- Re: Brinks v Rojas Update Request
  - From: Anonymous
- Re: Brinks v Rojas Update Request
  - From: Robert L Bass

Prev by Message: Re: Don't be the next victim
Next by Message: Re: Generic Central Station Horror Tales
Previous by thread: Re: Brinks v Rojas Update Request
Next by thread: Re: Brinks v Rojas Update Request
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home