Re: Generic Central Station Horror Tales

["Roland More" <NoSpamroland@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well I see it differently. What respect or sympathy does he deserve in this?
How do YOU judge a person or situation when first there is a screw up, then
you refuse to tell any part of the truth about it. Why? So you don't look
like an ass working for a big out of control company? I don't get it? Is
life for you in such a state that you persist, down to the point of
ridiculousness, even claiming you don't know anyone that does or did work
there? Next he'll probably tell everyone there is actually no such company
or service offered anywhere. It is beyond silly. You giving him the benefit
of the doubt seems equally silly. I didn't start with any wild claims or
paranoid stories. I didn't start the thread. I made a passing comment. He
persisted in dragging the details out by insult and pretense. He was given
more than enough information to verify the details. What would be the best
outcome, as I have said before, is a detailed explanation of a procedure
that makes a repeat of this event unlikely. Is that a sentiment you could
share?
"Doug" <not@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1gdEi.62524$xZ2.28082@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> So because my opinion isn't the same as yours regarding Mark,  I should
> now transfer all my business to him, is that about the size of it?
>
> I don't know how to thank you for that suggestion, it appears you have
> already been amply rewarded, and then some.
>
> Doug
>
> --
>
> "Roland More" <NoSpamroland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:46dff516$0$32512$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>I always hoped that I could find out information here that would prevent
>>me from making a costly mistake that someone else already had made. That
>>has proven true from time to time actually. If you feel that way you do
>>then may I suggest you take all your business to him. No need to worry
>>about anything that's happened to anyone else here. Go for it. As they say
>>"stupidity is its own reward".
>>
>> "Doug" <not@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:viSDi.62477$xZ2.28459@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> I've formed that opinion, but not about Mark
>>>
>>> Doug
>
>