[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: LOCKED PANEL

Subject: Re: LOCKED PANEL
From: "Jim" <nosp@xxxxx>
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 09:30:10 -0400
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <g0KBi.4331$Y7.3779@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46d77bbe$0$5559$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <UeTBi.4680$Y7.3631@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2ZTBi.76124$jH3.66369@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1188738960.316881.218160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"tourman" <robercampbell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1188738960.316881.218160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hah ! That will be the day. No one is shown anything about how it's
> done - ever ! All it is is returning equipment back to it's rightful
> owner in a usable format after its service suitability has been stolen
> by some unscrupulous company or individual. If alarm manufacturers
> really felt threatened by this, they likely would try but that would
> be a waste of their time and money, and they know it.


That's what Rojas thought.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LOCKED PANEL
  - From: tourman

References:
- Re: LOCKED PANEL
  - From: tourman

Prev by Message: Re: LOCKED PANEL
Next by Message: Re: LOCKED PANEL
Previous by thread: Re: LOCKED PANEL
Next by thread: Re: LOCKED PANEL
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home