Re: Race to Zero Part II

["Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Oh no!! This was the really WIERD part...I had giving him 3 bids...coming
down in price (by removing features...not profit too much).

Bottom line is he says; which one do you recommend? So I say; the FIRST one
I gave you (not because it was the most expensive, but because it was what
he needed to begin with) so he says...ok!

Stranger than Rocket Science!



--
Crash Gordon
-------ouch------

<I feel like I'm diagonally parked in a parallel universe>
"Frank Olson" <use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dT%Vi.163035$Da.161322@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| JoeRaisin wrote:
| > Crash Gordon wrote:
| >> HA!!
| >>
| >> Binky bites the dust.
| >> I was twice the price but almost half the monitoring and I ended up
| >> winning after a bunch of back and forth. I gave up at told the buyer
| >> to just go with the "other" guys. That was at least a week ago.
| >>
| >> I guess after reading Binky's contract they decided it wasn't worth it
| >> - I got an email today saying they wanted us to do the jobs.
| >>
| >> r
| >>
| >>
| > Some folks are sharp enough to know that the best deal doesn't always
| > come with the lowest price tag.
|
| I dunno.  How much did Crash compromise his price in this "race to
| zero"?  Was it really worth it?  I suppose if it involved a chain of
| restaurants, he might be able to justify the RMR, but if it was just a
| "one of"...