Re: Jim R's filed motions

["Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I don't think it matters if someone else made the panel for them. If I hire
someone to write a book for me about something I want them to write (work
for hire) the copyright is mine - the author just gets paid a wage no
royalties no copyrights or whatever is stipulated in my contract with the
author.

--
Crash Gordon
-------ouch------

<I feel like I'm diagonally parked in a parallel universe>
"Frank Olson" <use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:GajSi.85016$th2.76233@xxxxxxxxxxxx
|I would have mentioned that ALL of the "Brinks" security panels are
| manufactured by "others" for them.  Manufacturers DSC, Ademco, Paradox
| all put their names on the cans and keypads and also "private label" for
| the bigger companies.  In fact, they'll "private label" for almost
| anyone.  Jim, you provided photographs of the alarm circuit boards, and
| chipsets.  None of them say "property of Brinks" and *all* of them say
| either "Scantronic" or "Honeywell".  The programming manual for their
| 4000 panel has a copyright by Honeywell.  The "intellectual property"
| they're "defending" isn't even *their* intellectual property.  You've
| also caught Sableman in a big lie when he says that Brinks doesn't SELL
| their panels.  Get Crash to send you the original of that proposal he
| put on that photo sharing site (as well as anything else he can get
| a-hold of) and definitely call a "certain someone" that "brives a dus"
| to see if he can get you some more "bope on Drinks" and their sales
| tactics.  Sableman is protecting a company that is well known to
| vigorously hound any customer that tries to get out of their PSA.
| Sableman's admitted that Brinks installs equipment in new construction.
|  As them how they "defend" their "property" after the sale of the home
| goes through.  I'll bet they don't have a "leg to stand on", let alone a
| "pot to piss in" after you get through with them.
|
| Your "continuance" isn't going to pass muster, by the way.  I've never
| heard of a Defendant in a case filing for one on the grounds that the
| Plaintiff's Attorney can't be there.  If they wouldn't be able to be
| properly represented that would be cause for a motion for dismissal.