Re: oye

["Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

"Bob La Londe" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4702d258$0$26446$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "Just Looking" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:4702c696$0$19575$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Since Inovonics, Bosh, and DMP are each owned separately, each has its
own
> > funny interface to the other's product.  Bosch uses an 8125INV to
> interface
> > to Inovonics. Since that interface just fools the panel into thinking it
> has
> > hard wired popits on the system, you can't get any real information from
> the
> > wireless part of the system other than locally from the 8125INV
interface
> > itself. That goofy Bosch feature would make Napco panels easier to
program
> > in comparison, since there is just one programming interface that does
it
> > all. Range is certainly a real strength of the Inovonics line over ANY
> other
> > brand of wireless I have tried. But that comes at a price that is
> typically
> > higher than any other brand as well. Since GE has their finger in the
> > Inovonics pie too, I wonder how long before Inovonics joins what was
once
> > ITI under the GE umbrella?
>
> It already is.  They started merging ITI and Caddx part numbers a couple
> years ago.  Caddx has always (in recent years anyway) used the ITI
wireless.
> What ITI has going for it is incredible battery life.  10 years on some
> things.  WOW!.

However programming ITI wireless to Caddx panels is a convoluted joke
especially when using the latest RF keypad. Programming ITI wireless into an
ITI Concord is another story