Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion

["Edmond Fitzgerald" <ef@xxxxxxxxxx>]

"Frank Olson" <Use-the-email-links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:sL1Pi.8610$Da.1211@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Jim Rojas wrote:
>> 4599823
>> IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
>> NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
>> DALLAS DIVISION
>> Brink?s Home Security, Inc., ::
>> Plaintiff, :
>> : Case No.: 3:07CV0437-B
>> v. ::
>
> Sableman's an idiot.  "Edmond Fitzgerald" (the individual I told to go
> back to posting as himself) posts from around Nashville Tennessee. Anyone
> with a modicum of tool skills would be able to use a small program
> Microsoft supplies with their operating system called "tracert" to find
> that out.
>

Correct.  I am not a ship that sank on Lake Superior or Jim Rojas.  What I
am is an advocate of reading recurring services contracts before you sign
them so you won't have to all that pitiful whining on Usenet or talk radio
about how you've been screwed by some unfair company.

One more time here's the simple message:  Read the contract and don't sign
it if you can't or don't want to live with it.  Abiding by contracts is an
important part of civilization.