Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion

[Jim Rojas <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

According to Brinks, all these threads is just me and my sock puppets...
I do admit I do often talk to myself, but not since I got back on my
meds... :)

Jim Rojas



tourman wrote:
>> Someone needs to explain to me how someone would want to use a piece of crap
>> alarm panel like Brinks for a takeover anyway. If Brinks really does own the
>> system, you'd lose your license anyway for doing it in this state. Why
>> persist with all this other legal hocus pocus? The risk and the reward don't
>> match. Before I read those posts on take overs I didn't think anyone did it.
>> I still haven't ever seen or even heard of it being done anywhere in real
>> life. Sounds more like a tempest in a teapot someone turned into a payday.
>
> RHC: I am of the same mind as yourself. I really don't know why anyone
> would want to break the lock code on a proprietary Brinks panel unless
> they wanted to use it only in local mode. Especially since it's not
> very useful equipment anyway, and new panels sell for less than $100.
> Most panels are unlocked for clients so they can be put back on line
> properly without going to the expense of buying a new board. Brinks
> equipment to my knowledge is useless for that unless it goes back to
> Brinks.
>
> But as to your never having heard of anyone actually breaking the lock
> out code, I can assure you it is done because I do it every day. At
> the moment, I crack about 10 to 20 boards a week, sent to me by large
> customers I trust, other dealers I know in the area, but mostly by
> homeowners moving into newly purchased homes with improperly locked
> boards (DSC and Paradox only)....(see..http://www3.sympatico.ca/
> rh.campbell/unlocking_services.htm).... However, just like Jim does,
> we do NOT do it where we know it is in violation of someone's
> ownership or contract rights. I have over the years worked with Jim
> and we share mutual secrets on how to do this, and I doubt very much
> that there is anything to their claims. So I am following this Brinks
> business with some amount of dismay as to how this foolishness ever
> started as I'm pretty sure their accusations are baseless, given my
> knowledge of Jim and his unlocking activities. I think things have
> gotten out of hand because Jim is pretty pissed off at the moment and
> is reacting in kind, and more so, because he has seen fit to challenge
> them in their own game, and they have responded the only way they know
> how. I will admit, I'm pretty worried about the situation for his sake
> though. When you choose to sleep with an elephant, you better get out
> of the way when it rolls over.
>
> I have no doubt that I could crack any Brinks board within minutes
> given the knowledge and specialized equipment that both Jim and I, and
> one other that I know of, possess. The bigger question is, why would
> we want to even bother cracking their shit !!  But then again, if they
> continue to persist in this foolishness, I just might start where Jim
> left off. Then they can start on me up here in Canada.
>
> I hope Brinks backs off before this blows up in their faces. They may
> win this fight, but they will surely lose the battle......
>
>
>