Re: The latest Brinkle in my life

["Items for Sale" <g_ib6ub92000@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I would sue in Canada over the US these days.....Canada dollar is worth
more...LOL.


"Frank Olson" <use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ZIPWi.167814$Da.15550@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Bob La Londe wrote:
>> "Frank Olson" <use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
>> message
>> news:iVOWi.168844$1y4.87484@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> After more than a few rounds of email ping pong, my hosting provider
>>> (Mecca ehosting.ca) has decided that the latest revision of "Tech Help!"
>>> which I'm currently hosting at
>>> http://wwww.yoursecuritysource.com/faqs.htm is far too "controversial"
>>> for them.  They have given me twenty-four hours to remove it, or they'll
>>> cancel my account.  I find it interesting that they are still unable to
>>> point out where I've violated their terms of service other than
>>> referencing Mr. Sableman's letter which also doesn't provide much in the
>>> way of information (although it is cleverly worded to "push" all the
>>> right "buttons").
>>>
>>> I'm no longer hosting the program that was "banned" under the terms of
>>> the Injunction against Jim.  That program was called "Tech Help Beta".
>>> The version that I am hosting makes no reference to "Brinks panels"
>>> what-so-ever.  It does call them what they are and places them in the
>>> correct manufacturer's category (I don't see it as any different than
>>> the ADT panel cross-reference list Jim also provides in "Tech Help!").
>>>
>>> Brinks still hasn't contacted me directly regarding this issue.  The
>>> "prefer" to get to me through my hosting provider, which they no doubt
>>> view as the "weaker link" in all this.  You see...  it's much easier for
>>> a high powered lawyer like Mark Sableman to intimidate people in a
>>> company that knows nothing about security systems or how the industry
>>> "works".  Once you start throwing words around like "TOS Violation", it
>>> raises a few hackles in *all* the right places.
>>>
>>> Sableman appears bent on learning about "Canadian Justice" though, and I
>>> figure I'm just the guy to "teach" it to him.
>>
>> LOL.  Gonna sue him in Canadian court?
>
>
> I'm sure as heck not going to post my strategy in a public forum.  And
> what, sir, is wrong with "Canadian Court"?