Re: home alarm systems are for sissys

[motley me <tommy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Nathan W. Collier" <no@xxxxxxx> wrote in
news:WuOdnWfSVeMiTLbanZ2dnUVZ_qmlnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx:

> "motley me" <tommy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:Xns99DCC18977F8tommynospamcom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> It's not their monitoring... per se.
>> Most of us here know how Binkis puts in systems. They tend to the
>> lick and stick 3 doors and a motion, that would not be enough
>> protection for most homes. if you paid extra and had more put in then
>> that's a good thing. if not well.....
>
> brinks offers a service for a price.  if you choose to pay more you
> can certainly get more.  if you choose not to however, its awful tough
> to fault brinks for that.
>

It's not what they offer that stick's in every one's craw. It's how they
offer it. They try to sell it as a total security solution and give people
a false sense of security. Sure, it may be better than nothing but make
sure that the customer knows that going in and not find out later. The
people here sell security, Brinks sells monitoring.